首页> 外文OA文献 >Spatial updating in virtual environments: What are vestibular cues good for?
【2h】

Spatial updating in virtual environments: What are vestibular cues good for?

机译:虚拟环境中的空间更新:什么是前庭线索有益?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

When we turn ourselves, our sensory inputs somehow turn the “world inside our head” accordingly so as to stay in alignment with the outside world. This “spatial updating” occurs automatically, without conscious effort, and is normally “obligatory” (i.e., cognitively impenetrable and hard to suppress). We pursued two main questions here: 1) Which cues are sufficient to initiate obligatory spatial updating? 2) Under what circumstances do vestibular cues become important? STIMULI: A photo-realistic virtual replica of the Tübingen market place was presented via a curved projection screen (84×63° FOV). For vestibular stimulation, subjects were seated on a Stewart motion platform. TASK: Subjects were rotated consecutively to random orientations and asked to point “as accurately and quickly as possible” to 4 out of 22 previously-learned targets. Targets were announced consecutively via headphones and chosen to be outside of the current FOV. Photo-realistic visual stimuli from a well-known environment including an abundance of salient landmarks allowed accurate spatial updating (mean absolute pointing error, pointing variability, and response time were 16.5°, 17.0°, and 1.19s, respectively). Moreover, those stimuli triggered spatial updating even when participants were asked to ignore turn cues and “point as if not having turned”, (32.9°, 27.5°, 1.67s, respectively). Removing vestibular turn cues did not alter performance significantly. This result conflicts with the prevailing opinion that vestibular cues are required for proper updating of ego-turns. We did find that spatial updating benefitted from vestibular cues when visual turn information was degraded to a mere optic flow pattern. Under all optic flow conditions, however, spatial updating was impaired and no longer obligatory. We conclude that “good” visual landmarks can initiate obligatory spatial updating and overcome the visuo-vestibular cue conflict.
机译:当我们转身时,我们的感官输入会相应地改变“大脑内部的世界”,以便与外界保持一致。这种“空间更新”是自动发生的,无需有意识的努力,并且通常是“强制性的”(即,认知上不可渗透且难以抑制)。我们在此提出两个主要问题:1)哪些线索足以启动强制性空间更新? 2)在什么情况下前庭提示变得重要?斯蒂姆利:通过弯曲的投影屏(84×63°FOV)展示了蒂宾根市场的真实感虚拟副本。对于前庭刺激,将受试者坐在Stewart运动平台上。任务:将受试者连续旋转至随机方向,并要求他们“尽可能准确,快速地”指向先前学习的22个目标中的4个。通过耳机连续宣布目标,并选择不在当前视野范围内。来自知名环境的逼真的视觉刺激(包括大量的显着地标)允许精确的空间更新(平均绝对指向误差,指向变异性和响应时间分别为16.5°,17.0°和1.19s)。此外,即使要求参与者忽略转弯提示和“好像没有转弯一样指向”,这些刺激也会触发空间更新(分别为32.9°,27.5°,1.67s)。移除前庭转向线索并没有明显改变性能。该结果与普遍的观点相矛盾,即普遍认为前庭提示需要适当更新自我。我们确实发现,当视觉转向信息降级为单纯的光流模式时,空间更新受益于前庭提示。但是,在所有光流条件下,空间更新都会受到影响,因此不再是必须的。我们得出的结论是,“良好”的视觉界标可以启动强制性的空间更新,并克服视觉-前庭提示冲突。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号